GAS 2.0 was developed to enhance the validity and reliability of traditional GAS. It makes use of a goal menu and online calculator to help individuals with disability and/or their therapists set their own meaningful goals. In the advanced version, control goals can also be set, which makes goal outcome measurement more scientific.

The GAS 2.0 goal menu has been modelled on the Activities and Participation elements of the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Classification if Functioning and Disability (ICF) framework. The nine choices below represent the nine ICF Activities and Participation areas. Within each of those areas are categories and specific codes.

For each goal you want to set, select the area, category and code. You will then be directed to a page that will help you set your individualized goal.

Lorem ipsum odor amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Augue elit fusce phasellus praesent per fermentum. Pellentesque tortor iaculis erat; id nulla in. Primis justo sociosqu consequat netus magnis fringilla. Dolor placerat odio sociosqu suscipit viverra. Cursus senectus justo tempus praesent habitasse felis. Nisi felis malesuada ac; consequat magnis nullam magnis non. Dis euismod senectus interdum orci morbi iaculis inceptos vitae vitae. Condimentum urna duis torquent orci posuere sem magna parturient.

Feugiat feugiat egestas malesuada maximus ullamcorper suscipit nisl. Dapibus nisi malesuada sem maecenas venenatis fames ex sem. Maecenas montes ante volutpat mi congue penatibus ornare. Duis libero laoreet mauris massa at. Mus enim ultrices sociosqu condimentum nisl vitae. Pharetra ultricies metus finibus cubilia curabitur. Nulla ex nascetur vehicula molestie tempor penatibus duis nibh velit. Quam taciti maecenas sollicitudin curabitur sodales.

In our goal-tracking application, it was essential to ensure that user inputs are consistent and meaningful across different time periods and measurements. To achieve this, we implemented a function to adjust input values automatically. Here’s why this was necessary:

• Avoiding Duplicate Ranges: When the difference between the current value (FrequencyTextBox) and the target value (TargetTextBox) was less than the number of rows generated in the range table, it could result in duplicate entries. By adjusting the input values, we ensured that each range was unique and meaningful, providing a clear and distinct progression for the user.
• Consistency Across Time Periods: Users can specify goals with different time periods (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly). To maintain consistency, we adjusted values to a common time period when necessary. For example, converting a daily frequency to a weekly equivalent.
• Handling Similar Input Values: When user inputs for frequency and target values were close, it made sense to normalize them to more intuitive time periods. For instance, if a user’s daily target was only slightly different from their weekly target, we converted both to a bi-weekly goal for better clarity.
• Real-Time Feedback and Adjustments: To provide accurate real-time feedback and updates on the user interface, we ensured that adjusted values were immediately reflected in the controls and visual indicators. This approach improved the user experience by ensuring that the displayed values always matched the adjusted inputs.
• Seamless User Interaction: By automating the adjustment of input values, we minimized the need for users to manually reconcile their goals across different time periods. This resulted in a smoother and more intuitive user interaction, allowing users to focus on setting and achieving their goals without worrying about inconsistencies.

By implementing this functionality, we aimed to enhance the accuracy, consistency, and user experience of our goal-tracking application, making it easier for users to set and track their goals effectively.